DUTY, HONOR, COUNTRY

2007

Lately I’ve begun to notice a large number of Retired Generals appearing on TV. They come on with all kinds of analysis and suggestions to solving problems. As I watch, I begin to wonder why didn’t you come up with your suggestions and solutions while you where on active duty?

I for one, am not impressed by this parade of Stars. It gives me the impression that the top brass have become politicians and have forsaken the call of Duty, Honor and Country. Most ignore the strategies and tactics to accomplish the Mission. The question is, do they have solutions or where they part of the problem? If they have so much to say now, what did they say and how did they say it when they had their positions of responsibility. I have a strange sense that many where Yes Men willing to echo the words that their superiors wanted to hear. If this thesis is only partially true, we have a serious problem with our military leadership. We do not need people to rise to General because they belong to an old boys club, we need leaders who are willing to take a stand, leaders who take on missions to win, who believe in the axiom that” there is no substitute for victory”,

I have to salute General David Patreus because I believe he is a model of what a soldier should be: honest, has courage, a man of principles, good value systems, tactful but speaks his mind, has a vision, understands the needs of his troops, and understands his mission. The War in Iraq has presented many new challenges. A new type of war where your enemy isn’t visible; it requires new tactics, equipment and training. The manuals, tactics, strategies and training programs have just begun to take form. To accomplish this will take dedicated leaders who are committed to victory. We do not need the retired, political generals offering solutions when they have long forgotten the meaning of Duty, Honor and Country.